Japan Casino Uprising
內容簡介
A vision of an integrated resort rising above the turquoise waters of Osaka Bay in 2025 will not come to pass. It dashed hopes for a $10 billion complement to the Osaka World Expo, which is expected to attract 28 million visitors from the world over. Another grand resort plan at Yokohama was abruptly shelved in a political upheaval.
The euphoria was palpable when Japan finally legalised casino gambling in 2018 after trying for over twenty years. Up to ten casino resorts were to open across the country, which was touted to springboard Japan to become the world's largest casino market. It sparked a rush of Black Friday proportions by every casino company on the globe for the first three Japanese casino licences on the table. The casus belli on Japan's shores are twofold. It is home to a largely middle-class population of 125 million. The country is geographically in close proximity to China. Between the two, they checked all the boxes for a casino business. Where there is a large population, there is stable source of revenue. Where there is a middle-class demographic, there is disposable income. Where there is a casino in Asia, there is the ubiquitous Chinese gambler.
The wheels began to turn in Japan during a time when the Asian region was undergoing a casino revolution. The industry was swinging from its crucible in the west and pivoting east. The Las Vegas market had been completely dwarfed by Macau. The introduction of "integrated resorts" in Singapore shifted the paradigm in casino gambling. It skyrocketed the Marina Bay Sands resort to become the most profitable casino in the world. The Singapore market duopoly was enough to generate $5 billion in annual revenue. If Singapore's integrated resorts were the yardstick, then Japan holds even greater promise. The land of the rising sun is the world's third largest economy and possesses all the underlying attributes, in scale and otherwise, to put the Singapore casino industry in the shade. CLSA had projected that a dozen integrated resorts in Japan could deliver $40 billion a year. Morgan Stanley posited that a Tokyo metropolitan casino alone is capable of generating $6 billion in gross revenue, more than the Singapore market in its entirety, while an Osaka casino is worth $4 billion. The late Sheldon Adelson branded his Marina Bay Sands resort a "warmup" to the casino property that his company, Las Vegas Sands, plans to build in Japan. With all the heady forecasts, a long queue of investors had formed outside the offices of the Japanese government nerve centre in Nagatacho. Lawmakers were ecstatic. Businesses in Japan were similarly elated, eager for a slice of the lucrative casino pie. It was all systems go.
The picture turned vastly different over the course of four years. The investors are almost all gone except for two takers vying for the three concessions. The coronavirus had come and brought everything to a standstill. What was thought to be a walk in the park turned sideways for Japan every which way it turned. All these meant that the first integrated resorts in Japan will not welcome visitors until the next decade. Two of its primary actors, Sheldon Adelson and Shinzo Abe, did not live to grace their opening. What they had witnessed was the unprecedented uprising of the Japanese people, which thwarted their plans. For a country which brought the world the "Kanban" concept of just-in-time manufacturing, the dilatory pace to realise casinos in Japan is an oddity. The account between these covers is but the prologue of the Japan casino story.
配送方式
-
台灣
- 國內宅配:本島、離島
-
到店取貨:
不限金額免運費
-
海外
- 國際快遞:全球
-
港澳店取:
訂購/退換貨須知
加入金石堂 LINE 官方帳號『完成綁定』,隨時掌握出貨動態:
商品運送說明:
- 本公司所提供的產品配送區域範圍目前僅限台灣本島。注意!收件地址請勿為郵政信箱。
- 商品將由廠商透過貨運或是郵局寄送。消費者訂購之商品若無法送達,經電話或 E-mail無法聯繫逾三天者,本公司將取消該筆訂單,並且全額退款。
- 當廠商出貨後,您會收到E-mail出貨通知,您也可透過【訂單查詢】確認出貨情況。
- 產品顏色可能會因網頁呈現與拍攝關係產生色差,圖片僅供參考,商品依實際供貨樣式為準。
- 如果是大型商品(如:傢俱、床墊、家電、運動器材等)及需安裝商品,請依商品頁面說明為主。訂單完成收款確認後,出貨廠商將會和您聯繫確認相關配送等細節。
- 偏遠地區、樓層費及其它加價費用,皆由廠商於約定配送時一併告知,廠商將保留出貨與否的權利。
提醒您!!
金石堂及銀行均不會請您操作ATM! 如接獲電話要求您前往ATM提款機,請不要聽從指示,以免受騙上當!
退換貨須知:
**提醒您,鑑賞期不等於試用期,退回商品須為全新狀態**
-
依據「消費者保護法」第19條及行政院消費者保護處公告之「通訊交易解除權合理例外情事適用準則」,以下商品購買後,除商品本身有瑕疵外,將不提供7天的猶豫期:
- 易於腐敗、保存期限較短或解約時即將逾期。(如:生鮮食品)
- 依消費者要求所為之客製化給付。(客製化商品)
- 報紙、期刊或雜誌。(含MOOK、外文雜誌)
- 經消費者拆封之影音商品或電腦軟體。
- 非以有形媒介提供之數位內容或一經提供即為完成之線上服務,經消費者事先同意始提供。(如:電子書、電子雜誌、下載版軟體、虛擬商品…等)
- 已拆封之個人衛生用品。(如:內衣褲、刮鬍刀、除毛刀…等)
- 若非上列種類商品,均享有到貨7天的猶豫期(含例假日)。
- 辦理退換貨時,商品(組合商品恕無法接受單獨退貨)必須是您收到商品時的原始狀態(包含商品本體、配件、贈品、保證書、所有附隨資料文件及原廠內外包裝…等),請勿直接使用原廠包裝寄送,或於原廠包裝上黏貼紙張或書寫文字。
- 退回商品若無法回復原狀,將請您負擔回復原狀所需費用,嚴重時將影響您的退貨權益。
商品評價