Trial of Percy Lefroy Mapleton
內容簡介
At 3.20pm on the hot afternoon of 27th June 1881, the London Bridge to Brighton train pulled into Preston Park, a mile from its final destination. As the ticket collectors approached the carriages, one saw a thin, sickly looking man sitting in a first-class compartment beckoning him over. As the official arrived at the window, he saw that the passenger's face and neck were smeared with blood, and there was a clot beside an ear. There was blood between his fingers, blood upon his clothes, blood in the carriage and blood upon the train's footboard, which also bore the marks of bloodstained fingerprints. The carriage was otherwise empty.A terrible tale was told of being attacked and shot at by two other passengers, who had now disappeared, before falling into unconsciousness until arriving at Preston Park.As the passenger stepped onto the platform, it was noticed that a small chain was hanging out of his left shoe. One of the collectors stooped to pull on it, and a gold, white-faced watch emerged. The passenger had, he said, put it there for safekeeping. He was taken to Brighton for treatment, on the journey giving his name as Arthur Lefroy, of 4, Cathcart Road, Wallington, Surrey.So began the extraordinary story of Percy Lefroy Mapleton. During his return journey to south London accompanied by two railway police officers, a body was found by workers on the tracks in Balcombe Tunnel, 18 miles before Preston Park. Was this one of Lefroy's attackers, or was there something more sinister behind the discovery? The answer seemed to be given later that day when Lefroy absconded from his home and disappeared into thin air for eleven days.During this period, an inquest presided over by Coroner Wynne Baxter heard evidence from Scotland Yard's Divisional Surgeon Dr Thomas Bond and concluded that the man found in Balcombe Tunnel had indeed been murdered by Lefroy, and a warrant for his arrest was issued.A sketch of the wanted man was provided by someone who knew him; this, in turn, was developed into a wanted poster. When the likeness appeared in The Daily Telegraph of 1st July, it made history as the first time an image of a wanted person appeared in a national newspaper. As a result, with other newspapers subsequently publishing their own sketches of an increasingly-evil looking Lefroy, the public became hugely interested and false sightings of the fugitive were reported the length and breadth of the county. By the time he was finally arrested by Inspector Donald Swanson a week later, Lefroy was, in the public's eyes, already guilty, having been subjected to trial by the media.But was Lefroy telling the truth? He resolutely stuck to his story of being attacked by one or more fellow passengers, even when his solicitor suggested that the criminal psychiatrist Dr Forbes Winslow examine him in an attempt to prove insanity. There were no witnesses to any assault on the dead man, Mr Frederick Isaac Gold, and some witnesses stated that the train did indeed slow down just enough for potential attackers to jump off, as Lefroy had suggested.The jury at his trial had no such doubts, however, and after just ten minutes' deliberation found him Guilty. Dramatically, following the Judge's pronouncement of the death penalty Lefroy turned to the jury box and said: "Gentlemen of the Jury: Some day, when too late, you will learn that you have murdered me."In TRIAL OF PERCY LEFROY MAPLETON, No. 86 in the official Notable British Trials series, Adam Wood examines the reality of the events of 27th June 1881 and compares the polar-opposite lives of Lefroy and Frederick Gold, and considers the impact of The Daily Telegraph's decision to publish the likeness of a man who was, at that point, still far from being proved guilty.This book reproduces the testimony given at the trial, together with an introduction, a chronology and appendices.
配送方式
-
台灣
- 國內宅配:本島、離島
-
到店取貨:
不限金額免運費
-
海外
- 國際快遞:全球
-
港澳店取:
訂購/退換貨須知
加入金石堂 LINE 官方帳號『完成綁定』,隨時掌握出貨動態:
商品運送說明:
- 本公司所提供的產品配送區域範圍目前僅限台灣本島。注意!收件地址請勿為郵政信箱。
- 商品將由廠商透過貨運或是郵局寄送。消費者訂購之商品若無法送達,經電話或 E-mail無法聯繫逾三天者,本公司將取消該筆訂單,並且全額退款。
- 當廠商出貨後,您會收到E-mail出貨通知,您也可透過【訂單查詢】確認出貨情況。
- 產品顏色可能會因網頁呈現與拍攝關係產生色差,圖片僅供參考,商品依實際供貨樣式為準。
- 如果是大型商品(如:傢俱、床墊、家電、運動器材等)及需安裝商品,請依商品頁面說明為主。訂單完成收款確認後,出貨廠商將會和您聯繫確認相關配送等細節。
- 偏遠地區、樓層費及其它加價費用,皆由廠商於約定配送時一併告知,廠商將保留出貨與否的權利。
提醒您!!
金石堂及銀行均不會請您操作ATM! 如接獲電話要求您前往ATM提款機,請不要聽從指示,以免受騙上當!
退換貨須知:
**提醒您,鑑賞期不等於試用期,退回商品須為全新狀態**
-
依據「消費者保護法」第19條及行政院消費者保護處公告之「通訊交易解除權合理例外情事適用準則」,以下商品購買後,除商品本身有瑕疵外,將不提供7天的猶豫期:
- 易於腐敗、保存期限較短或解約時即將逾期。(如:生鮮食品)
- 依消費者要求所為之客製化給付。(客製化商品)
- 報紙、期刊或雜誌。(含MOOK、外文雜誌)
- 經消費者拆封之影音商品或電腦軟體。
- 非以有形媒介提供之數位內容或一經提供即為完成之線上服務,經消費者事先同意始提供。(如:電子書、電子雜誌、下載版軟體、虛擬商品…等)
- 已拆封之個人衛生用品。(如:內衣褲、刮鬍刀、除毛刀…等)
- 若非上列種類商品,均享有到貨7天的猶豫期(含例假日)。
- 辦理退換貨時,商品(組合商品恕無法接受單獨退貨)必須是您收到商品時的原始狀態(包含商品本體、配件、贈品、保證書、所有附隨資料文件及原廠內外包裝…等),請勿直接使用原廠包裝寄送,或於原廠包裝上黏貼紙張或書寫文字。
- 退回商品若無法回復原狀,將請您負擔回復原狀所需費用,嚴重時將影響您的退貨權益。


商品評價